Our cardinal delusion is that we can balance our government's books and invest in our country's future without either raising taxes or reforming ethicaly spending. The agreement simply makes both parties guilty of sin!
This site does not support the current version of your web browser. To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version or install another Web Browser. By Elder Dallin H.
Of the Quorum of the Twelve. From an address delivered at a Ricks College Devotional on 6 January As it has in the past, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints stands opposed to gambling, including government-sponsored lotteries. It has been clearly demonstrated, however, that all too often lotteries only add to the problems of the financially disadvantaged by taking money from them and giving nothing of value in return.
The poor and the elderly become victims of the inducements that are held out to purchase lottery tickets on the remote chance of winning a substantial prize. This statement condemns gambling from two gambling of view. In religious terms, it is morally wrong. In public policy terms, it is politically unwise. I will discuss both of these points of view.
First, gambling as a moral evil. Two generations ago, the English scholar and convert to Christianity, C. Lewis, employed an unusual literary device to explain some truths about Christianity. He authored a book consisting of letters of instruction from a senior devil, Screwtape, to his nephew, a junior devil named Wormwood.
The Screwtape Letters contains some brilliant insights into good and evil human behavior, presented more memorably than would have been possible in conventional sermons. But do remember, the only thing that matters is the extent to which you separate the man from the Ethically wrong. Murder is no better than cards if cards can do the trick. Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one—the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts.
There is something biblical in C. The Book of Job presents its teachings in this manner. I will employ this same technique in my discussion of why gambling is morally wrong. I will suggest how Satan and his tempters can use gambling to lead us away from actions and attitudes that our Father in Free downloadable slot game casino has commanded us to follow.
Jesus taught us to give. He will even test our willingness to sacrifice all that we have in service to Him and to our fellowmen. Satan, the adversary, teaches men to take—forcibly if necessary, deviously if feasible, continuously if possible.
Whatever encourages men to take from gambling ethically another without giving value in return serves the cause of Satan. Gambling is a game of chance that takes without giving value in return, why is gambling ethically wrong. Gambling puts money or other things of value into a pool and then redistributes it on the basis of a roll of the dice, a spin of the wheel, or a drawing of a number. Nothing of value is produced in the process.
What does gambling do to its participants? The attitude of taking something from someone else in order to enhance our own position—the essence of gambling—leads us away from the giving path of Christ and toward the taking germany gambling tax of the adversary.
The act of taking or trying to take something wrong someone else without giving value in return is destructive of spiritual sensitivities. Do these degrading effects apply to why seemingly innocent and trivial acts as buying a lottery ticket or giving political support to a state-sponsored lottery so that others can do so? What do you think?
Eat, drink, and be merry; nevertheless, fear God—he will justify in committing a little sin; … there is no harm in this. More than sixty years ago, President Heber J. Grant and his counselors, the First Presidency of that day, declared:. It is opposed to any game of chance, occupation, or so-called business, which takes money from the person who may be possessed of it without giving value received in return.
It is opposed to all practices the tendency of which is to … degrade or weaken the high moral standard which the members of the Church, and our community at large, have always maintained. A generation earlier, President Joseph F. Many other Christian congress internet gambling have branded gambling as a moral evil because it leads its participants away from the behavior and attitudes taught by Jesus Christ.
A Methodist minister, the Reverend Lycurgas M. The Christian will himself refrain from gambling and from publicly endorsing it in any form, realizing that gambling is detrimental to the purpose of life as revealed in Jesus Christ. Gambling promotes these evils. Gambling, the philosophy and practice of taking, is the polar opposite of the Golden Rule. Gambling is an ideal technique since the participant inevitably considers only his own prospects of winning.
The usual news coverage reinforces that attitude. It tells only of the winners. All are encouraged to ignore the reality that the winner has been enriched at the expense of a multitude of losers. In lotteries, fewer than 1 in 1, wins anything.
What of the effect on losers? Why related technique of the adversary is to get people to focus so intently on the desirability of ends that they ignore the morality of means. Screwtape and his helpers could undercut the moral base of an entire society if they could just persuade citizens, bit by bit, to ignore or justify immoral means on the basis that the ends are good.
Like so many other sins, a state-sponsored lottery is sugar-coated with the phony sweetness of a good cause. We hear proposals to use state-sponsored gambling as a solution to financial crises in state government. These proposals invite us to focus on the desirability of additional funding and of needed relief for hard-pressed taxpayers and to ignore the costs of gambling.
There are moral costs to the participants, and, as I will point out later, there are also financial costs in this means of raising money. Gambling tends to corrupt its participants. Its philosophy of something for nothing undermines the virtues of work, industry, thrift, and service to others. Gamblers commonly deprive themselves, they often impoverish their families, and they sometimes steal from others to finance their indulgence. We are all familiar with cases in which trusted employees have stolen from their employers, bringing tragedy upon themselves and their families.
All too often this ruinous sequence is traceable to a desperate attempt to pay gambling debts or to finance further indulgence. If Screwtape were instructing young tempters in an advanced course, which went beyond temptations for an individual patient and instructed in methods why is gambling ethically wrong bear on large numbers of people, he would include three influences:. First, an effective way to corrupt morals on a large scale is to persuade huge numbers of persons to try some relatively harmless behavior that will prove to be addictive to some of them.
Once the potential addicts can be identified, junior tempters like Wormwood can single them why is gambling ethically wrong for special attention, encouraging them to continue their indulgence until they are securely hooked. For reasons we do not understand, some persons lack the control mechanism that allows them to try something and then leave it alone.
Some are susceptible to addictions to tobacco, fallsview casino poker tournaments to alcohol or other drugs, and some can be addicted to gambling. For the susceptible, what looks like a harmless experiment actually chains them to an indulgence by bonds that seem too strong to break.
If losing a portion of our will pleases the adversary—and it must, since freedom to choose is God-given—then few pastimes will please him more or serve why is gambling ethically wrong ends more effectively than those seemingly harmless activities that prove to be addictive to some. This is especially effective for pastimes that can be made to appear recreational, stylish, and fun.
Screwtape would cite the familiar television beer commercials as a model for this method. Highly visible public gambling enhances the impression of recreation and assists in recruiting new participants. Third, if a senior devil like Screwtape sought to weaken the productive basis of an entire society, he could not do better why is gambling ethically wrong to try to interest its citizens in spending their productive or leisure time in gambling.
Whether occupation or pastime, gambling adds no goods or services to the productive base of the society and it contributes nothing to the physical, emotional, or social well-being of its participants. I conclude my discussion of the moral evils of gambling with these words of Richard L. Usually it begins modestly; and then, like many other hazardous habits, it often grows beyond control.
At best it wastes time and produces nothing. At worst it becomes a ruinous obsession and fosters false living by encouraging the futile belief that we can continually get something for nothing. Gambling is obviously an effective instrument for opposing the work of God. No wonder the prophets have opposed it vigorously. Gambling is also bad political policy.
Solely in terms of its effects on society and government, a law that permits gambling is hard to justify, and a law that sponsors or promotes gambling is a sure loser. It should not be surprising that many of the public policy arguments against gambling are mirror images of the moral and religious considerations just reviewed.
A religious and moral person is generally a good neighbor and a good citizen. The encouragement of moral behavior by citizens is generally good public policy. Gambling Undercuts Productivity and Encourages Crime. The first public policy argument against gambling concerns productivity. Will explained it this way:. Government support of gambling gives a legitimizing imprimatur to the pursuit of wealth without work.
All you have to do is just take your roll of the dice. A Catholic priest, Monsignor Joseph Dunne, deplores what the lottery teaches children: The philosophy of something for nothing or something for far less than it is worth is at the root of a multitude of crimes: By nourishing and legitimating that philosophy, gambling is a threat to the prosperity and peace of any nation.
Gambling is especially pernicious when it is administered by government or when government relies on it as a substantial source of public revenue. What was intended as a plan to control gambling has become a high-powered device to promote it.
The people who can least afford to take chances with their money are not only not dissuaded from gambling but are actually being cajoled into it by the state. Millions of dollars are being spent by New York State casino money online play lavish advertising on television, on radio, in buses, and on billboards.Readers debate over the ethics of casinos and gambling in response to our cover story, “A Big Bet Gone Bad.”. This statement condemns gambling from two points of view. In religious terms, it is morally wrong. In public policy terms, it is politically unwise. I will discuss both. [Gambling] leads to the sort of undoing of our common democracy, for many lawmakers is to slash morally-meaningful social programs.